Guide to a Quality Fully Online Course (Undergraduate and Graduate)
Union Commonwealth University
Guide to a Quality Fully Online Course (Undergraduate and Graduate)
Overview & Alignment
A quality online course begins with a clear structure and purpose. Each course should include:
A “Start Here” or “introduction” video or module with course orientation, tech expectations, and a welcome message or video.
Clearly stated course and module/week-level objectives that are measurable and aligned with assessments and activities.
Weekly overviews summarizing content, listing deliverables, and providing estimated completion times.
Syllabus & Weekly Agenda Expectations
Each course must include a syllabus that follows the approved institutional template. The syllabus should:
Contain all required institutional policies (e.g., academic integrity, accessibility services, withdrawal procedures, grading scale, Title IX, and student support services).
Clearly state instructor contact information, office hours (or virtual meeting availability), and expected response times for communication and grading.
Include a weekly agenda or course calendar outlining:
Assignment due dates
Exam windows or project deadlines
Required synchronous sessions or optional class meetings
Breaks, holidays, and institutional calendar dates
Indicate where and how students are permitted to use AI within the course, including required appendices when AI is used in assignments.
Provide links to the LMS (Ulearn) course navigation, support resources, and technology requirements.
Ensures students can understand how to begin the course, what is expected of them, and how the course is structured.
Instructional Content & Assessments
Instruction and assignments should follow a backward design model, ensuring alignment between objectives and activities.
Use process-based assignments: require students to plan, draft, revise, and reflect.
Include diverse assessments: projects, multimedia, peer review, and applied research.
Provide clear rubrics with grading criteria.
Include low-stakes checkpoints to reduce pressure and support student learning.
AI Use: Policy & Integration
Courses must include a clear and specific AI usage policy, stated in both the syllabus and assignment instructions.
Permitted Uses (with instructor guidance):
Brainstorming or outlining ideas
Grammar and syntax checking
Comparing student drafts with AI samples for critique
Prohibited Uses:
Submitting AI-generated responses as original work
Using AI to answer quizzes, write papers, or complete discussion responses
Required AI Appendix:
If students use AI for any permitted activity, they must include an appendix in their submission with:
The full AI prompt they used
The full AI-generated response
This ensures transparency and allows instructors to assess the student’s critical engagement with the tool.
Engagement, Interaction & Presence
Courses should promote regular interaction in three ways:
Student–Instructor: timely feedback, announcements, office hours, video check-ins
Student–Student: meaningful peer interaction via discussion, group work, or peer review
Student–Content: rich multimedia, simulations, self-paced activities, formative quizzes
Technology, Accessibility & Support
Use technology that is purposeful and student-friendly
Ensure all materials are ADA accessible (alt text, captions, clear fonts)
Link clearly to institutional resources: IT support, library, tutoring, accessibility services
Best Practices & Tips
AI Use Transparency
Require AI use to be documented in an appendix showing the prompt and output.
Ask students to reflect briefly on how AI helped or hindered their thinking process.
Regularly review your AI policy in class to ensure student understanding.
Designing Effective Discussion Boards
To reduce reliance on AI and increase originality, avoid generic prompts like “Summarize the reading.” Instead:
Use personal application: Ask how the reading connects to students’ experiences, communities, or future goals.
Incorporate multimedia: Require responses to a podcast, infographic, or short video instead of text alone.
Assign roles: Rotate roles like “devil’s advocate,” “connector,” or “summarizer” to guide critical thinking.
Ask for process, not product: Have students describe how they approached a problem or how their thinking changed.
Include critique tasks: Ask students to evaluate two contrasting views or sample responses (including AI ones).
Use staged responses: First post is reflective or exploratory, second post is analytical or peer-focused.